In case you haven’t heard, a big playground is coming to Keizer soon.
If things go according to plan, the Big Toy will be built in June.
The project has had some issues, such as a nine-month delay and a controversy over the location that lasted most of 2014.
The Keizertimes has covered every step of the project. To check on our past coverage, visit www.keizertimes.com and search for Big Toy. We have put together a set of answers to questions we’ve frequently heard in regards to the Big Toy.
Where is the Big Toy being built?
The playground is being built at Keizer Rapids Park. More specifically, the Big Toy is being built in the orchards area off of Chemawa Road, not far from the dog park.
That was not the original location. The original site was between the boat ramp and the amphitheater. For months that was the assumed location, but in January 2014 then-mayor Lore Christopher opined a move was necessary. By the end of the year, following an in-depth Urban Growth Boundary process, the orchards became part of city property and the site was selected. Nearly 200 trees were recently cleared.
When is it being built?
The project is scheduled to be built in a five-day period, from June 10 to 14.
How much will this cost?
The project budget is about $319,000. Until recently, the budget was $105,000 more as a poured-in rubber surface was going to be used. Earlier this year, the decision was made to go with engineered wood fibers, hence the cut in the budget. However, Keizer officials will be applying for grants to pay for the more expensive surface. If that funding happens, the wood fibers will be moved to other parks in Keizer.
How much of that money has been raised?
For a number of months, the figure hovered around the 50 percent mark. With the budget cut, the number jumped to 70 percent. Even without that, fundraising efforts have been picking up in recent weeks. The largest contributor in the money raised so far is still the city, as $100,000 in System Development Charges (SDC) helped to kick-start things.
What if the money isn’t raised?
The project will still go on. Bill Lawyer, Public Works director for Keizer, has emphasized the city is committed to making sure the Big Toy gets built. If needed, the city will put in more SDC funds to cover any shortcoming.
Janet Carlson, the Marion County commissioner who is co-chairing the Big Toy’s fundraising committee, has said fundraising won’t end in June. She feels once people see the project done, they will be more willing to contribute financially.
How did the design come about, and is it finalized?
A designer from New York-based consultant Leathers and Associates came to Keizer in November 2013 for Design Day. She suggested using the site between the amphitheater and the boat ramp, then led efforts to get design feedback from 3,000 elementary aged students in Keizer. Design ideas from youth were collected and turned into the design shown to community members in a packed meeting at the Keizer Civic Center.
For the most part, the design has been finalized. One recent change has been the addition of a volcano slide in light of Salem-Keizer Volcanoes owner Jerry Walker pledging funds to pay for the feature.
Wasn’t this project delayed?
Technically speaking, it was delayed twice. While a playground was part of the master planning process for KRP in 2008, a specific project didn’t get going until Will Stitt brought up the idea at a Parks Board meeting in late 2012. The initial idea was to do the playground the following year, but it got pushed back to 2014 to allow for more time, especially in terms of fundraising and design.
Funding issues and the ongoing debate over location, however, pushed the build date from September 2014 to this June.
What makes this a community build project?
Community members will be doing the actual building over the five-day span in June. Think of an old-fashioned barn raising, swapping out the barn for a large playground. In addition, volunteers have been putting in many hours at meetings to work on details for the project.
It’s important to note that while volunteers will be doing the labor, trained people will be overseeing the construction. More details about how the build days will work should be known after an organizational day on April 7.
What if I want to get involved in any way?
No help is being turned away. Plenty of time slots for the build days are still available; those interested can check out the project’s website at www.keizerbigtoy.org and fill out a form to volunteer. The website has plenty of information about the project, including how to provide financial support.
How long has this been planned?
Since November 2012. A Community Build Task Force was formed shortly after and has been meeting monthly.
Will this for sure be done?
Project leaders have expressed complete confidence it will be done and bristle at the notion it might be delayed again or might not happen at all. As mentioned above, city leaders have pledged to make sure it will be done.
The Keizer Police Department is all about the POP.
Since John Teague returned to the KPD and took over as police chief in the fall of 2013, a shift has been accelerating. With the shift, problem-oriented policing (POP) is now a way of life at the department.
In simple terms, KPD personnel now use whatever resources deemed necessary to be proactive in regards to crime, instead of merely reacting.
The KPD still has officers on regular patrols. Those officers still respond to calls. Detectives still investigate crimes.
But now resources have been changed around. The department has a full-time crime analyst, Cara Steele, who can look over data and spot trends or clumps of crimes happening in a small time frame or similar locations.
Teague shifted motorcycle patrol officer resources and brought back the mostly dormant Community Response Unit, a four-member team heavily involved with building relationships to take on long-standing problems such as drug houses and organized retail crime.
Officers not only have more time to concentrate on doing patrols, they can directly share what they find on patrol with other units such as CRU while helping to figure out problems that don’t always require using handcuffs.
“Part of the shift is moving away from traditional policing to problem-oriented policing,” Teague said. “COP (community-oriented policing) is a tactic of POP; POP is the philosophy. The purpose is to identify the root problems and solve them. Sometimes you involve the community; that is one of the tactics. COP didn’t really gain traction until recently.”
While at the Dallas Police Department, Teague was working on a thesis on Disproportionate Minority Contacts in the Department of Corrections at Western Oregon University when he talked with Craig Prins, executive director of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission, about reducing the cost of crimes and incarcerations. That led to Teague extending his thesis for a year and changing his focus to evidence-based policing.
Teague said research led law enforcement leaders around the country down the wrong path for years dating back to the early 1970s, including the notion that officers should not use any discretion but instead follow the law to the letter. On a national scale, Teague said that philosophy has been quickly changing.
“I just happened to be paying attention to the shift in the industry,” he said. “I was in the right place at the right time and paid attention to the right things.”
POP was coined in 1979 by Herman Goldstein, a professor at the University of Wisconsin. In 1987, John Eck and William Spelman expanded the model into SARA (Scanning, Analysis, Response and Assessment).
“If using SARA didn’t curtail crime, you’d go back to the scan and do it over,” recalled Jeff Kuhns, the KPD deputy chief. “That was the word we used within our agency. Now we’re onto POP.”
In other words, not only is POP far from a new idea, it’s actually far from new to the KPD.
Kuhns, who has been at the department more than 25 years, said former chief Marc Adams had started the implementation before retiring in early 2013.
“They keep attributing the new COP to chief Teague,” Kuhns said. “That’s a fallacy. This agency has been aware of POP for years. The key thing this gentleman (Teague) has done is he has renewed our agency’s focus on COP. He’s done that by doing two key things. One is mitigating or reducing the amount of time for officers to be inputting data so they can be free to problem solve. That helps find root problems. And he’s re-upped the CRU team, which had been mothballed. They can go the extra mile on bigger problems to solve them.”
Teague noted he was at a recent Keizer Rotary meeting with Adams when he was again credited for introducing a new concept to Keizer.
“He laid the foundation for all of this, whether it took off or not,” Teague said of Adams. “Generally it has not taken off anywhere until very recently. Everyone was operating in fits and starts with POP in the 1990s.”
Teague, who started at KPD the same day in 1989 as Kuhns but was gone more than four years to serve as police chief in Dallas before returning in 2013, said community policing has a long history in Keizer.
“It’s important to note with community policing that Chuck Stull introduced it here,” Teague said of Keizer’s police chief who was terminated in 1997. “Adams was hired to build upon that. Now we’ve really turbocharged it, if you will. Just because I put it in a different gear shouldn’t cast a bad reflection on Stull or Adams. The whole industry has had to catch up or figure it out. They were a reflection of their times. What they were doing was right, proper and fitting for their times. Now, times have caught up to the whole industry.”
A big part of the change includes less reliance on numbers. Whereas the traditional police model calls for enough tickets to sustain the department, fewer Keizer residents are being called into court since Teague took over in September 2013.
“It’s easy to judge your police department by the number of arrests you make,” Teague said. “It’s more difficult to subscribe to a philosophy that is less quantitative. It takes some willingness to leave the comfort of numbers. But it’s the right thing to do, man. At the end of the day, a police department should be concerned about order and disorder, the safety in the community. We know we can’t arrest our way out of a problem. We must find the root problems of crimes. It’s better for everyone. We have to unplug from counting numbers. Not a lot of places do that; it’s great that Keizer does.”
For years, the mantra with the KPD was more officers were needed to deal with crime. The department will soon have a 38th sworn officer – down from a peak of 41 officers – but efficiency with the lower resources has become paramount.
“Industrywide we’ve become so reliant on numbers to justify our existence and expansion,” Kuhns said. “It’s difficult to measure outcomes (with POP) or what crimes you’ve prevented by using it. If we get an officer at a house three nights trying to solve a problem and we solve it, we’ll never be able to measure the future responses we prevented.”
Teague feels city leaders have bought into the system, which could help explain the credit he gets for the change.
“We’re not focusing on outputs, we’re focused on outcomes,” he said. “We’re not focusing on numbers. The outcomes we focus on are police legitimacy and community safety. If budget numbers require (a certain amount of) work product to determine how many cops we ought to have, this system will not work. This system requires trust. That trust can be measured but it’s qualitative, not quantitative. It comes from the community, how safe people feel they are. We have to be involved in talking with the community.”
Kuhns said one change comes in morning briefings.
“In the old school way, a sergeant would look at an officer and ask how many arrests were made and how many tickets were issued last shift,” Kuhns said. “The new way of thinking is, ‘What problems are you finding? What are the root causes? How can we involve Cara to look at the data?’ It’s a different way to do things.”
There’s another change with the morning briefings: various units meet and Steele shares any trends worth noting. Sgt. Bob Trump and his CRU members attend the meetings on Tuesdays. Officers coming off night shift and officers coming onto their day shift attend, along with Lt. Andrew Copeland and detectives. In all, having 20 people in the room isn’t too uncommon.
“You can’t replace that, having everyone in the room at the same time,” Trump said. “There are a lot of valuable experiences shared in that room. We all know about something happening and are passing along information. If we hear about something, we pass it along.”
Copeland likes the revised briefings as well.
“The 7 a.m. briefings are a good time for people to bring up any concerns,” he said. “Officers can say here is the issue and they will pass the information along so (Steele) can do a workup on a particular house. I can take that on or pass it to CRU. They are identifying areas of more concern, rather than having patrol respond to the same call over and over.”
Officer Carrie Anderson finds the new way for morning briefings much better.
“Briefings have become an information sharing time,” Anderson said. “Information sharing is a lot more precise now, since it’s face to face. It’s a much more efficient way of getting information out there. It’s good coming together as a group. There is some great information sharing. It was way more isolated in the past.”
During a recent Tuesday meeting, Anderson shared information about an apartment she responded to the day before with a number of stolen items and drugs. CRU member Darsy Olafson wrote a search warrant and the property was seized that day.
“It was clear I’d need extra help,” Anderson said. “I told the sergeant I needed more hands and we discussed a plan.”
Often Copeland will decide on the approach.
“Copeland is responsible for identifying the problem, assessing the seriousness and looking at the resources available,” Kuhns said. “Multiple guys have a piece of it. Cara is looking at the numbers and data. It’s a very holistic approach, as opposed to the old school way of let’s just remove the problem with handcuffs and hope that fixes things.”
Copeland gave a recent example of a female with mental issues.
“I got several agencies involved with her and we found her housing,” Copeland said. “Before, she would have gone under the radar. She would have slipped through the cracks. If not for us having the POP mindset, she would be a transient on the street being victimized over and over. We’d be spending time doing a lot of reports on her. Now she’s in a good place. It changed her life and her family’s life. Doing that reduces costs elsewhere. She now writes me thank you letters.”
Copeland feels the KPD has bought into POP for a simple reason.
“POP has been an easier sell because cops want to solve problems,” he said.
Teague said one of the changes calls for officers to spend less time on reports and more time doing patrols or talking with community members.
“We’re still getting information, but in a short synopsis,” Teague said. “It’s worth it to free cops up for 1.5 to two hours a day to stay on calls for service and to identify problems.”
That change has suited Anderson, a 20-year KPD veteran, just fine.
“Things are refreshingly different,” said the KPD’s lone female officer. “Before Teague, everything was a report, including something minor that took a couple of minutes to respond to. There was a lot of data entry. It was very time consuming. I spent hours at my desk writing reports. Then you’d start the next day over again. I never could get caught up. I had to hurry through calls to get back to reports, especially if I was making arrests. I felt like I was working a desk job. I felt like I could never get caught up.”
Anderson said she now averages about four or five reports per shift, instead of 15. Reports are made for each call, but can now be short narratives with a few notes if needed. She gave an example of the difference.
“Before, there would be an anonymous call of a barking dog,” Anderson said. “I would check it out and would sit and wait, then write a report that there was no dog. I would include the time, address, if I talked to anyone, when I responded and what I did the whole time. It would take twice as long to write about it versus actually doing it.
“Now I put in the box I was here, there was no dog and I send it,” she added. “I don’t have to go into the whole system and fill all the little boxes. That means a lot more time on the road now.”
Having more time also means Anderson can use that time problem solving.
“The longer you’re an officer, the more you realize sometimes an arrest isn’t the answer or it won’t fix the problem,” she said. “Sometimes it causes a problem. Sometimes one person just wants the other person to go to jail. The answer doesn’t always have to be an arrest. At times (before) an arrest was just an easy answer. When I have the opportunity, I try to involve myself more and talk to both parties. I try to take a different approach to make sure there is justice for everyone. An arrest might feel better in the short-term, but it’s not the long-term answer. That person will get out and do the same thing again. You need to get to the root of the problem.”
Teague said in the 1960s there was a movement to get away from officers using their own discretion.
“We saw the consequences,” he said. “Now we very much want officers to use their discretion. That’s the biggest shift I’ve seen in my 25 years, is the move to more discretion. Everyone wants cops to have discretion. You don’t want to be cited for going 26 mph in a 25 zone.”
The way Anderson sees it, POP lines up with her internal philosophy.
“I’ve always said this job is all about problem-solving,” she said. “I always had this approach. This is what I’ve been doing. It’s a thinking game. It’s a brain game. For me it’s a refreshing change. It’s what I’ve been saying for years.”
Not only does POP de-emphasize numbers in terms of arrests and the like, Teague said implementing it has nothing to do with other numbers, i.e. how many officers are on the roster.
“None of it is driven by a need to be more efficient,” Teague said. “All of it is driven by the need to make the community safer. The nice thing about that is that the change in policing strategy is more efficient and requires fewer resources.
“Having 41 (officers) is a magic number because we were once there,” he added. “If we were there, I would add one more (officer) to both night shifts. But if we had 10 more people, would we have made the change? Absolutely we would have made the change. It isn’t just about arresting people, it’s about preventing crime in the first place and reducing the cost of crime to victims, perps and families, all of that. It’s the right thing to do.”
That has included bringing back CRU, which was disbanded in June 2010 when Trump was running it.
“We have a different mission now,” Trump said. “We’re more broad. In the past we focused on mostly drug investigations. That tended to be what CRU did. How CRU is put together, we are capable of doing surveillance for drugs. Now we also look at livability, like the squatters on Verda Lane last year leading to neighbors complaining. We are able to get in that environment. We obtained a search warrant and remedied that problem months sooner than we would have otherwise. We can identify through(Steele) problem locations and see how to permanently solve problems.”
Trump noted he has resources within the KPD as well as outside those walls, such as nuisance abatement, Department of Human Services and Keizer Public Works.
“We try to be as creative as we can for our stakeholders,” Trump said. “It’s more of a team concept. We can bring in anyone who can help towards a permanent solution.”
Trump said CRU’s goal is to be familiar with the community.
“We do it in a number of ways,” he said. “We have bicycle patrols. We talk to a lot of people. We aim to ride through school zones and neighborhoods. We hear about stuff you wouldn’t normally hear. If you just have a conversation, people tell you about things that are bothering them but they wouldn’t really want to call dispatch about.”
Trump gave an example of an issue Bair Park neighbors were having.
“Kids were going through tall grass and smoking,” Trump said. “We coordinated with public works to mow it. Then we got back ahold of the neighbors and let them know it was solved. It was solving a livability issue.”
Despite all the changes, not everything has changed. For example, officers still have training, as highlighted last week in the Keizertimes.
“There will still be bad people,” Teague said. “You still have to have police officers in uniform driving police cars. If you had a cop for every doorstep, you would still need cops. You always have to have cops that do traditional police work since there are bad people out there. But where we can interfere with that, we’re going to do that. That is not traditional policing. That is POP.”
Patrol officers still drive around Keizer, even with the changed philosophy.
“Random patrol is still valuable,” Teague said. “If you live on a street where crime never happens and you pay taxes, you still expect to occasionally see a cop.”
Those cops are being hired now with different skill sets being sought.
“We look for people now who are more open minded, have cultural empathy, emotional stability, social initiative and are flexible,” Teague said. “People tend to think in terms that cops are inflexible, just the facts. If you just have the law and see if the law was broken or not and make an arrest, that doesn’t take a whole lot of skill. When you are trying to unravel another person’s world, that requires an incisiveness that goes beyond just skill. There’s not a lot of people who can do that job who want to do the job.”
While changes are being made now, Teague figures it will only get better in the future when people like Copeland, 16 years his junior, will be primed to take over.
“I told Craig Prins it would be a decade before POP makes traction in Oregon,” Teague said. “Well, we’re way ahead of that. Some things have really fallen into place for it to happen. It really takes a significant philosophical shift from outputs towards outcomes. Copeland’s generation, going through the leadership training now, is getting it in spades. It will take his generation to do it industrywide.”
The industry as a whole has been having a rough time nationally, highlighted by the ongoing saga between police and citizens in Ferguson, Mo. Trump said what’s happening in Ferguson isn’t indicative of what’s happening in Keizer or other places.
“When people see Keizer practice law enforcement, they see a difference,” Trump said. “People come up to us and thank us for what we do. It’s been real positive.”
Teague said things aren’t necessarily being looked at in context.
“In Ferguson, a vast majority of the people aren’t rabble rousing protestors that shoot cops,” he said. “You will always have some of those people. We could have some terrible accident that happens here that looks like, on the surface, we made bad decisions. We could have that happen today. But I think most people would give us the benefit of the doubt. That’s just something you deal with.
“We know there are some communities that feel disenfranchised, that don’t feel they have access to justice,” Teague added. “It’s incumbent upon us to maintain dialogues with all the people in Keizer. We owe them that. If our notion is really to increase community safety, we have to have that dialogue to do that, to identify and solve problems. It is part of our charge.”
During the past 17 months, Keizerite Mike Smith has dedicated much of his time to creating the characters for a new video game, Paperbound, that will debut on Playstation and Windows platforms March 31.
In that time, he’s created more than 15 gigabytes of artwork (translation: a lot). But there’s one, tiny problem.
“I suck at my own game. Anywhere we’ve shown it off, I end up losing,” said Smith.
Paperbound is a four-person, multi-player fighting game, which makes it a challenge all on its own. But players also have the capacity to switching the gravity mechanics while playing, meaning attacks can come from just about anywhere.
“It’s like Super Smash Bros. on crack,” Smith said.
While Smith has not been involved in the actual programming, he’s designed every character and most of the background/battlefields where fights take place. The characters are derived from a few classical works and a wholly concocted one.
“We’ve got people and places from Journey to the Center of the Earth, Dante’s Inferno, the Egyptian Book of the Dead, The Book of Five Rings and a made-up book called Skull Kingdom,” Smith said.
That’s meant everything from Egyptian deities, to mummies, martial artists and devils have been brought to life through Smith’s thick line work. Some of his artistic influences are Arthur Rackham, Ralph McQuarrie and Moebius (aka Jean Giraud), but the place of highest honor is reserved for Brian Froud.
Froud is known for his artwork featuring fairies and goblins, but gained prominence working with Jim Henson on the movies Labyrinth and The Dark Crystal. The latter of the two had the most impact on Smith.
“It’s my favorite movie and it just left a mark on me. It was scary as hell, but it was the most unique story I’d ever seen. Froud’s artistry in character design stuck with me,” Smith said.
For a while, Smith entertained dreams of working as a muppeteer, but it fell to the wayside after Henson’s death. He’d failed art classes in high school, but didn’t let it deter him from pursuing his passion in college.
“My training has been a lot of self-training. I bounced around from community college to community college. I began taking fashion design, but my instructors allowed me to spin it into costume design,” Smith said.
When asked to design a sweater, Smith put it on a Nazi villain. When asked to create an actual costume he made an outfit for someone to dress as a salad.
He managed to get some design work on a film around 2005, but the project fell apart. Faced with continuing to pursue his passion for film or raising his kids, Smith put his career on the backburner – for eight years.
In 2013, he found himself with more time on his hands and decided to see if there was still any interest in his particular skill set. He posted some of his portfolio work to an indie video game website and was flooded with 25 potential projects. He narrowed those to three and went with Paperbound, a game spearheaded by developer Dan Holbert.
Unbeknownst to Smith at the time, Holbert had worked on two of his favorite games, ones that brought to life the Transformers cartoon of the 1980s. Smith’s studio prominently features a framed poster from the Transformers the Movie.
With a project lined up, Smith experienced a crisis of faith.
“I had allowed my talent to go dormant,” Smith said. “I got this great opportunity, but I was rusty. I knew I knew how to do it, but it wouldn’t come. I had to battle a lot of fear and anxiety.”
He plowed through with some inspiration from an unexpected source.
“When I took lunch breaks, I began watching the old Rocky movies on Netflix in 20-minute installments. Rocky IV (which features Dolph Lundgren as Balboa’s Russian nemesis Ivan Drago) became my favorite,” Smith said. “I bought the soundtrack and cranked it when I felt insecure. I saw all these challenges as Ivan Drago coming at me every day. Some days were terrible, but other days, I knocked that guy out.”
Now he’s 11 days away from a worldwide release of the game.
The interconnected world we live in meant Smith spent much of his time working in a vacuum. He is one part of a five-person team with three members in California and one in the United Kingdom working on the soundtrack.
It’s left the days leading up to release feeling more than a little unreal.
“I’ve made posters for this game, we’ve had people play it. I played it with them. It’s shown up on all the video game websites I visit, but it won’t be totally real until the release,” he said.
If things go well, Smith will continue creating downloadable content (DLC) for Paperbound, but the one thing he’d like to return to is a children’s book he’s working on. A project that is completely his own.
“If Paperbound sells well and we do DLC, I have to stay open for that.” Smith said. “But, Walter the Last Knight is something I still want to get back into. It’s really heavy on the Froud influence with long legs and distorted bodies, but it’s my own fairy tale.”
Smith’s story seems to be rife with inspiration for any book, children’s or otherwise.
In January, I met with McNary High School senior David Henderson and handed him a small voice recorder. We’d never met before, but I wanted to know more about his life as a high school student.
“My first thought was it would be interesting, but I wasn’t sure about putting my thoughts out there for other people,” said David, 17.
His second thought was: “Why me?”
If he had asked me that question at the time, I would have told him I wanted the exactly type of person who would ask that question. In the end, he answered it for himself.
“I figured that maybe I was qualified to do it. I’m sure there are other more interesting people, but why not me?” Henderson said.
For about three weeks, David recorded some of his thoughts about school, life and faith, among other topics. The result is the first episode of McNary Radio Diaries. You can listen to it online at keizertimes.com.
The goal of McNary Radio Diaries is to give voice to students who might otherwise not see their name in our paper. The ones who may not speak up often in class, but still have a lot on their plates and even more on their minds.
Initially, David found it odd to walk his dogs while talking into a recorder, but he warmed up to it surprisingly quickly.
“It felt nice to just talk and not worry about boring other people,” David said.
As I listened to the raw audio of David’s recording, I found myself cheering him on. Even as he sometimes struggled with words, I could feel his frustrations with things like standardized testing and the relief that came with little victories.
When I talked with David a few days ago, I asked him what he learned from being part of this project.
“That I can have opinions, and they might be ones that people want to listen to. In school sometimes, it doesn’t always feel like that but maybe (my opinions) actually do matter,” he said. “Also, be open about how you feel about things, even if you feel like nobody else would care. That’s the stuff you should be putting out there.”
The grin that spread across my face hurt my cheeks. That was precisely the point.
(Final note: If you listen to McNary Radio Diaries online, I would love to know what you think. Please send critique or feedback to [email protected] Lastly, I would like to thank Haris Khan, a junior at McNary, who is a Pro Logic ninja and helped me greatly with this project.)
While parts of the world seem to be losing their heads and spinning out of control, Keizer keeps its cool and continues on a modest path. We’e a community that celebrates our kidsweroll up our sleeves when our schools and organziations need help.
The continuing crisis caused by the Islamic State in Syria and Iraqi is troubling, but it is far away. What goes on with Congress between the two parties and with the Obama Adminsistration is maddening but that too is far away. When national and international events are out of our control we hunker down and concentrate on our local neighborhoods.
That is certainly in evidence here in Keizer in winter 2015.
Keizer schools have been and will hold a variety of fundraisers from the Whiteaker Middle School Cabaret that raised money for that school’s choir programs and travel expenses.
Clear Lake Elementary held its annual auction recently to raise funds for an asphalt athletic track for students as well as local neighbors who utilize it for their fitness routies.
Earlier this month the McNary High School Fine Arts fundraising event, Knight of Arts, sold out and raised close to $40,000 for the arts at the school including a closed-camera system for the Ken Collins Audtiorium.
The Keizer Parks Foundation held its annual Pinot for the Parks wine event last week, as well. The foundation’s mission is to raise funds for the city’s 19 parks. The money raised at the Pinot event is earmarked for the big playground project at Keizer Rapids Park.
The McNary Athletic Boosters Club is finalizing fund raising for artifical turf at the high school’s Flesher Field.
It is not only money that Keizer gives to community projects and schools. It also gives time and muscle.
The big playground community build project will take place over five days in June. There are about 2,000 shifts available for the community to work. Community members will dig, wheelbarrow, nail, paint, cater and morae during what promises to be the biggest single community volunteer event ever.
About 40 volunteers toiled on a blustery day to clean up the landscaping at Keizer Civic Center.
The Keizer Chamber of Commerce will seek hundreds of volunteers to help set up and operate the Keizer Iris Festival in May.
Keizer residents take pride in their community and it is proven every time a dollar is donated or an hour is volunteered. We remain focused on working for the good of the community.
Keizer is experiencing no violent protests, no chanting of racist slurs, no shootings. We can feel positive about our community but we must always be mindful that not everyone in the world has it so good.
Regarding Jim Keller’s view (Letter to the Editor, March 13) about liberal bias on the part of the Keizertimes, I note in the same paper, approximately 24 column inches devoted to supporting Keller’s conservative views (Michael Gerson) and 15 column inches reflecting what would appear to a liberal view (Gene McIntyre). The bias, if there is one, seems to be the other way (like Fox News?)
It is hard to know what a Republican stands for these days.With a newly won Congressional majority the only unifying theme in bills they have introduced seems to be “How can we harm Obama?”It hasn’t helped them much so far.
Each time they defer to the more extreme Tea Party bloc they get embarrassed. The attempt to link destruction of President Obama’s immigration actions with Department of Homeland Security funding went down in flames. Now they are dealing with an ill-considered letter to the leaders of Iran signed by 47 Senators. Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark, barely more than two months in the Senate, composed a letter to Iran’s leaders warning them that any agreement restraining development of nuclear weapons might be thrown out by the next President.
Senator Cotton is on record believing that only a military solution will be effective. He also revealed an incomplete understanding of Constitutional law and geographical uncertainty about which country might include Tehran. The real surprise is that senior Republican senators hitched their wagons to this very green star.They have elevated a young senator who got some percentage of Arkansas’ votes to the same footing as our President. It makes them seem unhinged by their hatred for Obama.
This act diminishes America.In showing contempt for President Obama and Iran they also show contempt for China, France, Germany, Russia and United Kingdom, all of whom believe that the current leaders of Iran are more open to negotiation than previous rulers.
The Logan Act of 1798, too long to be quoted here, names penalties for citizens claiming without authority to represent the United States in foreign affairs. Outside of that these senators have condemned an agreement that hasn’t even been made yet.Would they have foreign nations believe that they should from this point forward deal directly with the dissenting side of the Senate?
As the only office voted on by all Americans, presidents have always represented the nation in foreign affairs. Ninety-four percent of pacts with other nations have been executive agreements. Just about all those agreements have been honored by succeeding presidents.
Born in a small eastern Washington town to Goldwater Republicans, I am genetically pre-disposed to be a Republican. There don’t seem to be any modern Republicans that I recognize. Efforts at fiscal restraint should include corporate welfare and tax fairness, and even the Department of Defense.Conservation used to be something that Republicans championed.
We live in Keizer. Oregon Republicans are now searching for a course that might return them to equal partnership in Oregon government.The party is fractious enough right now that they were not even able to plan from one conference. The Dorchester Conference was considered ideologically impure by more conservative Republicans who organized the “freedom rally.”A party divided portends more trouble ahead.
With a base of only about a quarter of registered Oregon voters Republicans must attract voters both Democrat and non-affiliated.Stump speeches about “failed Democratic policies” won’t be enough. Stump speeches delivered from a position of moral superiority and moral certainty won’t attract much support.Though I am of an age that longs for return to a remembered and possibly imaginary purity we are in a different America.
So, Republicans, give us something we can support. Assume that we understand today’s problems and say what you would do to make Oregon better.
(Don Vowell gets on his soapbox regularly in the Keizertimes.)
Some good news for Oregon’s beleaguered middle class and those whose incomes are even lower: Oregon’s Office of Economic Analysis has announced that there will be a re-awakening of the kicker law to the tune of $349 million. Of course, as always when the government hints of a break for taxpayers, this may be a false alarm if revenue ends up coming in short of the prediction.
Whatever the case, it means that we must wait until the current budget cycle ends at midnight on June 30 to find out whether our tax burden has been lightened. Possibly, divine intervention must occur to make it happen; however, if it does, it will mean a 5.1 percent rebate on an Oregon taxpayer’s liability in taxes to the state in 2014, figured after deductions were computed to determine the amount owed.
Among the 50 states, Oregon’s the only one with a “two percent kicker” law, requiring the entire surplus to be returned to the taxpayers if actual tax collections are greater than two percent of what was predicted when the two-year budget cycle began. Should your head spin a bit in trying to sink your teeth into how this is done, be aware that this money will not, as has been the practice in past years, be delivered by way of a special check sent to each taxpayer. Rather, your 5.1 percent “refund” will be realized by you when you file by April 15, 2016, your taxes for 2015. Yes, Oregon government wants to use your money as long as it can, even if it belongs to you on July 1, 2015.
I considered myself to have been a rather silly fellow. I thought that if we generously gave up the state’s kicker law on individual returns we could help Oregon’s social programs and schools to improve their benefits to all citizens in need and students at every level, pre-K through graduate school. I laugh now at how simple-minded and misled I was by way of viewing that the kicker would be used to meet public needs.
What changed my mind about the kicker are the examples of where huge taxpayer dollar amounts have been wasted by those in charge of spending in public agencies and education organizations. A few of them are:
• Mismanagement at the Willamette Education Service District.
• The farce of hiring a former Chemeketa Community College administrator now receiving PERS benefits to help find a new CCC president who was “found” at the school as CCC’s interim president.
• The supremely high cost of planning for a Columbia River Crossing about which nothing but costly meeting and plans drafting have been accomplished.
•The Cover Oregon debacle.
• The Gain Share giveaway and Business Energy Tax Credit debacle where overburdened taxpayers must pay to make up the losses.
• The costly but worthless Oregon Education Investment Board and staff.
• University sports costs versusquality university education.
• The Kitzhaber timber advisor’s taxpayer-paid cash cow.
I’m confident a number of Oregonians could add to the list of examples provided here. Yet, nothing or next to nothing is ever done to make those of us who pay our taxes feel better about what happens to the money we’re forced to give the state every year. Those responsible for corrupt practices should be held accountable. Yet, as it all festers and putrifies, nothing is done to correct, weed out or punish the wayward guilty.
I will believe the state is honest about the math used to calculate the kicker and what I am owed back when my tax debt for 2014 is duly reduced. The governor’s office under Kitzhaber, his girlfriend and their alleged accomplices have led me to further disillusionments from where trust in government doing the right thing in Oregon can no longer be taken for granted.
(Gene H. McIntyre’s column appears weekly in the Keizertimes.)
In the past, the Community Response Unit of the Keizer Police Department was focused on drugs.
Since being brought back early last year, CRU’s scope has expanded. One of those expansions has been the Organized Retail Crime position, targeted at ongoing thefts at businesses in Keizer – particularly at Keizer Station.
Figures from the KPD show the need for such an emphasis. One store in Keizer Station reported more than $130,000 in thefts last year, while another store reported $10,000 to $15,000 in losses due to theft in one month.
Further KPD figures show an average of 90 reported criminal incidents annually at the shopping center right off Interstate 5 each year since 2011, with 103 in 2012, 107 in 2013 and 101 last year.
More troubling: figures show that through the end of February, there have already been 59 reported criminal incidents so far this year.Of those calls, 34 percent involved an arrest.
In terms of shoplifting criminal incidents thus far in 2015, there have been 32 total in Keizer, with 22 at Keizer Station. That means nearly 69 percent of shoplifting incidents in the city so far this year have been at Keizer Station.
In preparing the data, KPD’s crime analyst Cara Steele includes an important note: “A consistent rise in reported incidents indicates better reporting by merchants and increased patrols by Keizer Police.”
Steele noted officer Kevin DeMarco, the ORC officer in CRU, is laying the groundwork for relationships with Keizer Station merchants as well as other police departments.
“He’s developing relationships with businesses in Keizer Station,” Steele said of DeMarco. “He’s been getting good feedback. It will change. We have been making some good stops. Kevin has done an exceptional job with the relationships.”
DeMarco said those in organized retail crime rings often travel up and down I-5, hitting shopping centers.
In September 2002, three Democratic congressmen visited Iraq in an effort to prevent a war they thought was a terrible idea.
Rep. Mike Thompson, D-Calif., said very little there, explaining afterward that his sole purpose was to tell Iraqi officials that “if they want to prevent a war, they need to prevail upon Saddam Hussein to provide unrestricted, unfettered access to the weapons inspectors.”
On the other hand, former Rep. David Bonior, D-Mich., and especially Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., were quite outspoken while on Iraqi soil. McDermott urged Americans to take Saddam’s promises on weapons inspections at “face value” and charged that President Bush was willing to “mislead the American people.”
Needless to say, supporters of Bush and his policies did not deal kindly with McDermott and Bonior. Writing at the time in the pro-war Weekly Standard, Stephen Hayes called them “The Baghdad Democrats” and said: “What apparently didn’t concern the congressmen was the damage their trip might do abroad to any U.S.-led effort to deal with Saddam.”
Perhaps it’s not surprising that Republicans are now reminding everyone of the trio’s journey. To defend the 47 Republican Senators who signed a letter to “the leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” they invoke the everybody-does-it argument: that interfering with a president conducting a negotiation is as American as apple pie.
The letter itself, written in strangely condescending language that a good civics teacher would never use, instructs the Iranians about our Constitution. Any deal reached by President Obama without congressional approval would be nothing more than an “executive agreement,” the senators said. It could be voided “with the stroke of a pen” by a future president, and “future Congresses could modify the terms of the agreement at any time.” It was a blatant effort to blow up the negotiations.
In fact, it is utterly baffling that champions of this letter would even bring up McDermott and his colleagues. For one thing, many of the very same people who denounced the Democratic trio are now praising the letter. Hayes, for example, in an article posted last week headlined “A Contrived Controversy,” said the letter, offered by “patriotic senators,” was “a fact-based, substantive argument, in public, about a matter of critical importance to the national security of the United States.”
Let’s see: It’s patriotic if members of Congress contact a foreign leader to interfere with a president whose policies you don’t like, but outrageous for politicians to do a similar thing to undermine a president whose policies you support.
Which goes to the larger point: The three members of Congress went to Iraq on their own, without any support from their party’s leaders, and were actively taken to task even by opponents of Bush’s policies. At the time, I wrote a column highly critical of the visit that I didn’t enjoy writing because I respect the three men. I also noted that, in light of all the pressures to fall into line behind Bush, “anyone with the gumption to dissent these days deserves some kudos for courage.”
Nonetheless, I argued that just as the Vietnam anti-war movement was damaged by “the open identification of some in its ranks with America’s enemies,” so did the congressional visit set back the cause of those who, at the time, were trying to get Congress to pass a far more restrained war resolution.
By contrast, the 47 Republicans undercutting Obama included the Senate majority leader and the chairman of the Armed Services Committee and clearly speak for most of their party. Only seven Senate Republicans, to their credit, refused to sign, including Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.
Two stipulations: While I support Obama’s effort to reach an agreement with Iran, I also believe in a strong congressional role in setting foreign policy and embrace the freedom to dissent from a president’s choices on war, peace and diplomacy. And, yes, most of us have had moments of inconsistency when our beliefs about a substantive matter distorted our views on process issues.
But tossing off a letter to leaders of a foreign state plainly designed to sandbag a president in the middle of negotiations goes far beyond normal procedural disagreements. It makes Congress and the United States look foolish to the world. It weakens our standing with allies and adversaries alike. And, yes, many Republicans seem to believe anything is permissible as long as it’s designed to foil Obama.
This is far more damaging to us than what those three congressmen did in Baghdad.